I am now here in Madison at the home of my friend, John Anderson, of DIYmedia.net. John is spearheading the effort to arrange webcasts of many of the talks and sessions at the Media Reform Conference and Be the Media! Conference, and he has gotten access to three different servers to aid this cause. Tonight […]
Archive | November, 2003
Today the company that bought Emusic, Dimensional Associates, put out a press release clarifying somewhat their intentions for the on-line music service. Here’s the meat of it, but please excuse the marketing hyperbole:
partnering with the most renowned live music venues across the US to launch
its new program, EMusic Live. The program, set to launch in the coming weeks,
will bring together an existing network of venues, previously known as the
Digital Club Network (DCN), to make electrifying live performances available
to consumers from far-flung clubs across the country, including: the 9:30 Club
in Washington, DC; The Casbah in San Diego, CA; the 40 Watt Club in Athens,
GA; The Metro in Chicago, IL, Toad’s Place in New Haven, CT and Arlene Grocery
in New York, NY, to name just a few.”
It’s an interesting move, since the rights to live recordings are different than recorded music. Specifically, when an artist performs her songs live, her record label does not necessarily own that performance, and she can be free to sell those rights or sell recordings of it herself — depending on her contract.
Typically the record company owns the physical recording that makes up the CD, known as the “mechanicals,” and the specific performance that is on the CD. These days the songwriter, which is often the artist, retains ownership of the song itself, meaning that she can perform it all she wants without getting other permissions and without having to pay to do so.
So, in many cases the new Emusic Live could sell live recordings for popular artists simply by paying royalties to use the songs, which goes to the songwriter, and the live performance itself, which probably goes to the artist.
However, modern contracts can get much more complex than that, so there could be more pieces to the pie. Given that Emusic Live will be working with a small number of venues, my guess is that individual artists and promoters will be contracting to have their music released as a part of agreeing to perform at that venue.
It’s not unlike Clear Channel Entertainment’s new initiative to sell “instant bootlegs” of concerts it promotes, where you can buy a legal CD-R of the concert you just saw only minutes after it ends.
Of course, it still remains to be seen if any major labels or labels that aren’t already selling music through Emusic will participate.
It also remains to be seen how much of the live music will be available through Emusic, and if the recordings will be sold on a similar basis–40-60 downloads a month for a monthly fee–or on a per-song or per-performance basis. I could see how adding otherwise unavailable live concert recordings to Emusic could make it much more attractive, especially given the recent change in terms from a virtually unlimited download service to a pretty limited one.
I might be more willing to accept the new terms if it includes live performances that I can’t otherwise get from Amazon or the CD store. But as of this weekend I’ve cancelled my Emusic subscription and I’m not particuarly inclined to sign up again. Of course, I’ll keep an eye out and if the new Emusic Live has enough artists that I like and the terms are reasonable, I might change my mind, but as of right now it’s a big question mark.
Simply offering some new content is not enough to undo the damage of alienating most of Emusic’s customer base, though I guess Dimensional Associates is betting they can greatly expand that customer base with the new offerings. But given the relative difficulty of getting live performances from the big name artists on major labels — so far Clear Channel can’t even get that — I find it unlikely that a whole bunch of new people would be attracted to Emusic Live who weren’t otherwise interested in the original Emusic service, which focused on smaller and independent label artists.
The University is cutting the phone lines and not letting reporters anywhere near the studios of Radio For Peace International, so the flow of information is restricted, and will probably come through more informal channels for the moment.
Here’s the latest update, forwarded to me from the Free Pacifica list:
From: Chuck Scurich
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:11 PM
About 2 hours ago today (Monday) I received a call from the general Manager of Radio for Peace INternational (via cell phone).
He, James Lathem, told me that the United Nation’s University for Peace has begun today to use agressive means to force the shut down of this progressive radio station in Costa Rica.
At noon they cut off the water supply to the remaining 8 staff and volunteers holed up in the building.
Four hours later the University cut the telephone lines.
The security guards have turned away reporters and cameramen who have come out to try to enter the campus.
Since the University is owned by the United Nations, they are claiming immunity from all laws and law enforcement; the station has little power against this major act of censorship.
Radio for Peace International is the only shortwave radio station that airs Democracy Now, Free Speech Radio News, Alternative Radio, Counterspin, Making Contact, Radio Nation, TUC Radio, and many more.
These programs are heard in every part of the world, at least 120 countries of the world. This is an outrage. Please spread the word and write to Koffi Annan at the United Nations (email@example.com) to intervene.
If anyone can assist these folks in any way possible, these people who provide us, the world, with this important media resource, please, now is the time.
I received the latest update in the ongoing struggle between global shortwave community broadcaster Radio For Peace International and its landlord, the United Nations chartered University for Peace. Unfortunately, the news is not good (but there are glimmers of hope):
10/30/29 – The Copy Exchange – The University for Peace (UPaz) gave little ground to Radio for Peace International in negotiation that took place over the last few months over compensation to RFPI for their $200,000 facilities and for the cost of moving the station. UPaz would only set up an escrow account containing a tiny percentage of what is owed the station – money that RFPI cannot access. RFPI walked away for the talks empty handed, forced to relocate but penniless to do so.
UPaz officials stated that RFPI must vacate their facilities by October 31st or face legal action, though it is unclear what form that action might take, since Costa Rican law does not apply to international land, such as UPaz property.
Regardless, RFPI does plan to move and is determined to keep their dream alive. Land outside San Jose has been donated to RFPI, a deed being drawn up to transfer ownership to the station. From a newly established office in San Jose, capable of containing the studios, RFPI will be able to live stream their programming over the Internet during the three to six month period required to set up the transmitter and tower at the new location.
Once the transmitter is established RFPI begin broadcasts again using a studio-to-transmitter link from the San Jose studio.
UPaz reportedly is planning to make use of the present RFPI facilities, for which they offered nothing in monetary consideration, for their own purposes.